FL Supreme Court will take its time deciding fate of Black-opportunity congressional district

FL Supreme Court will take its time deciding fate of Black-opportunity congressional district

The Florida Supreme Court will consider voting-rights advocates’ appeal of a congressional redistricting map that erased Black representation in North Florida, but the justices might not decide the case in time to affect the November elections.

In an order issued on Wednesday, the court gave Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute and other plaintiffs until Feb. 28 to file their initial brief in the case. The state has 30 days after that to reply; the groups have another 30 days to respond to the state’s arguments; and then the state has 30 days to file its final answer.

Which would place the end of the briefing section of the case at the beginning of July. Qualifying to run for Congress ends on April 27. The Legislature, which would have to draw a new map if the high court decides for the voting-rights groups, adjourns its regular session on March 8.

And that doesn’t account for oral arguments, which the justices said “will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately 60 days prior to oral argument.”

History

In 2022, the state House and Senate approved a redistricting plan that would have preserved a Black-opportunity district in North Florida, meaning one where Black voters had a chance to elect their candidate of choice. Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed it and insisted the Legislature adopt his own map, which abolished the district, and the lawmakers complied.

Black voters living within the state’s old plantation zone were divided between white-majority districts that elected Republicans. Al Lawson, a Black Democrat, had served for the old district.

DeSantis argued the district constituted a racial gerrymander, but a trial judge ruled that the governor’s map violated Florida’s Fair Districts Amendment, which forbids diminishment of minority voting power.

The First District Court of Appeal upheld the DeSantis map on Dec. 1, ruling that the district didn’t benefit the required “naturally occurring,” “geographically compact” Black “community.” Instead, it said, the district’s Black population was “far-flung” and “artificially brought together.” The district stretched around 200 miles to capture Black voters between Duval and Gadsden and Leon counties.

The post FL Supreme Court will take its time deciding fate of Black-opportunity congressional district first appeared on Daily Florida Press.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Committee week in Florida’s Capitol: Welcome to the festival of ignorance

Image
Legislators came to town for the autumn ritual of political harlotry they call “committee week.” Tallahassee’s collective IQ dropped by a good 60 points. That’s bad, but what they propose doing to Florida is worse. Seems Sen. Joe Gruters, R-$ara$ota, who also is chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, was intimately involved with a plot to quash the Democratic vote. Remember that “ voting reform ” bill the governor signed on “Fox and Friends” last May? The one that restricts access to ballot drop-boxes, limits vote-by-mail applications, forbids giving people standing in long lines a bottle of water, and lets partisan poll watchers police canvassing boards? Even though Florida ran an immaculate election in 2020, Republicans goose-stepped in time with the Madman of Mar-a-Lago and claimed with straight faces they merely wanted to prevent election “fraud” — which is about as common as polar bears in Miami. (What fraud there was, was courtesy of the GOP .) Joe Gruters ...
Read more

U.S. House GOP would make it easier for feds to give public lands away to states

Image
U.S. House Republicans included in the new rules for the chamber they passed this month a provision meant to make it easier for Congress to give away public lands. The provision is a fairly technical piece of the 55-page  rules package . It affects internal House accounting and requires that anytime Congress were to give any federal lands to a state, municipality or tribe, it would not be counted as a loss to the federal budget. House Republicans had an identical rule when they controlled the chamber from 2017 to 2019. Advocates and critics agree the measure would be helpful to any effort by the House to transfer federal lands to states. But they disagree about the wisdom of such giveaways. Republicans and conservative groups see states as preferable stewards of most public lands. Those closest to the land are in a better position to make decisions on how to manage them than those in Washington bureaucracies, they say. Environmental groups and Democrats see federal divest...
Read more

Democratic governors press U.S. Senate to act on voting rights legislation

Image
WASHINGTON — Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and 16 other Democratic governors are urging the U.S. Senate to pass two bills that aim to protect voting rights. Both measures need 60 votes to advance under Senate rules but have been stalled by Republican opposition in the evenly divided Senate. “Without decisive action by the federal government this year to protect voters’ access to the ballot and ensure the integrity and transparency of our elections, the voices of Americans across the country, especially Americans of color, will be suppressed,” the governors wrote in a Monday  letter  to U.S. Senate leadership. Governors who signed the letter include Jared Polis of Colorado, Tim Walz of Minnesota, Steve Sisolak of Nevada, Phil Murphy of New Jersey, Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Roy Cooper of North Carolina, Kate Brown of Oregon, Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania and Tony Evers of Wisconsin, among others. One bill, known as the  John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2...
Read more